Passer au contenu
Bhargava Bridges

Leadership

Mesurer ce qui compte sans se noyer dans les indicateurs

On demande aux petites organisations de mesurer plus que jamais, souvent sans capacité supplémentaire. Une poignée d’indicateurs bien choisis sert mieux la mission et le bailleur de fonds qu’un tableau de bord tentaculaire.

Écrits par Rajiv Bhargava, fondateur et directeur général

2 min de lecture

Cet article est présenté dans sa version originale anglaise.

Few phrases produce as much quiet anxiety in a small nonprofit as “impact measurement.” Funders reasonably wish to know what their support achieved. Boards wish to govern with evidence. Staff, meanwhile, wonder when they will find time to collect data while also delivering the programme being measured.

The solution is not to measure everything. It is to measure the right few things well.

Outputs, outcomes and honesty

It helps to distinguish between two kinds of measure. Outputs describe activity: classes held, meals served, devices distributed. Outcomes describe change: learners who can now apply for jobs online, families who are more food-secure, organisations whose systems are now secure.

Outputs are easy to count and necessary to report. Outcomes are harder to demonstrate and far more meaningful. A healthy measurement practice includes both, and is candid about the limits of what it can prove.

A practical framework

  • Choose three to five indicators that genuinely reflect the change you seek. Resist the temptation to add more.
  • Collect data at the point of service, through simple forms or brief conversations, rather than reconstructing it later.
  • Pair numbers with stories. A figure demonstrates scale; a story demonstrates meaning. Both, gathered with consent, are forms of evidence.
  • Report what did not work. Candour builds more trust with funders than uninterrupted success ever could.
  • Use the data yourselves. Measurement that informs no decision is merely paperwork.

Distinguishing goals from results

On our own website, the figures in our impact section are labelled plainly as 2030 goals rather than achievements. The distinction may seem minor. It is not. The credibility of the entire sector depends on organisations being scrupulous about the difference between what they hope to accomplish and what they have demonstrably done.

Measurement, at its best, is not an audit imposed from outside. It is an organisation’s way of learning whether it is keeping its promises.

Mettre ces idées en pratique

Si un article vous a interpellé, parlons de ce qu’il pourrait signifier pour votre organisation.

Engager la conversation